Analyzing Trump's Agenda: Trade Deals, Deregulation, And Executive Actions In His Next 100 Days

Henrik Larsen

6 min read

Post on Apr 29, 2025

4.6

Share

Trade Deal Renegotiations and Protectionist Measures

Trump's approach to trade was characterized by a significant departure from traditional free-trade policies. His administration prioritized renegotiating existing agreements and implementing protectionist measures, aiming to reshape the global trade landscape in favor of the United States.

Re-negotiating NAFTA:

Trump's stance on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was a central component of his campaign. He repeatedly criticized NAFTA, characterizing it as a detrimental deal for American workers. His administration initiated efforts to renegotiate the agreement, ultimately leading to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). This process involved significant friction, with "trade war" threats and intense negotiations over key issues.

• Initial threats to withdraw from NAFTA: Trump's initial threats to withdraw from NAFTA created uncertainty and pressure on Mexico and Canada to engage in renegotiations.
• Key points of contention during renegotiations: Key points of contention included rules of origin for automobiles, dispute resolution mechanisms, and dairy access to the Canadian market.
• Impact of USMCA on trade relations with Mexico and Canada: The USMCA, while replacing NAFTA, did not eliminate all points of contention and continues to shape trade relations among the three countries.
• Economic consequences of the changes: The economic consequences of the shift from NAFTA to USMCA are complex and subject to ongoing debate, with differing views on the overall impact on jobs and trade flows.

Trade Wars with China and Other Nations:

Beyond NAFTA, Trump initiated several "trade wars," most notably with China. This involved imposing significant "import tariffs" on various goods, leading to a tit-for-tat exchange of retaliatory tariffs. This period was marked by significant volatility in global markets.

• Specific examples of trade wars (e.g., with China, the EU): The trade disputes with China involved a wide range of products, from steel and aluminum to consumer goods. Similar disputes, though on a smaller scale, occurred with the European Union and other nations.
• The rationale behind the tariffs: The rationale often cited for the tariffs was to address the "trade deficit," protect American industries, and combat what the administration considered unfair trade practices.
• Economic impact on both the US and affected countries: The economic impact was widely felt, with increased prices for consumers, disruptions to supply chains, and uncertainty for businesses.
• Long-term implications for global trade: The long-term implications for global trade remain uncertain, with ongoing debates about the effectiveness and sustainability of protectionist measures.

Deregulation and its Impact on Various Sectors

A key element of Trump's agenda was deregulation across various sectors, aiming to reduce government oversight and stimulate economic growth. However, this approach also generated considerable controversy.

Environmental Regulations:

The Trump administration significantly rolled back environmental regulations, arguing that they were overly burdensome to businesses and hindered economic development. This approach garnered strong opposition from environmental groups and climate change advocates.

• Specific examples of deregulation (e.g., Clean Power Plan): The administration significantly weakened or repealed key regulations, including the Clean Power Plan, which aimed to reduce carbon emissions from power plants.
• The stated justifications for deregulation: The stated justifications often centered on reducing regulatory costs for businesses and boosting economic growth.
• Environmental consequences of these actions: Critics argued that the deregulation led to increased pollution and hindered efforts to mitigate climate change.
• Public and expert reaction to the deregulation: The deregulation sparked significant public debate and opposition from scientists and environmental experts who highlighted the potential negative environmental consequences.

Financial Regulations:

The Trump administration also sought to loosen financial regulations, arguing that the Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, was overly restrictive.

• Attempts to weaken or repeal parts of the Dodd-Frank Act: Efforts were made to weaken or repeal certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, aiming to reduce regulatory burden on financial institutions.
• The potential impact on financial stability: Opponents argued that these changes could increase the risk of another financial crisis.
• Arguments for and against these changes: Proponents argued that deregulation would stimulate economic growth, while opponents warned of increased systemic risk.

Executive Actions and Bypassing Congress

Trump's presidency was marked by a significant reliance on executive actions, often bypassing Congress to enact policy changes.

Frequency and Scope of Executive Orders:

The sheer number and breadth of executive orders issued during the first 100 days were noteworthy. This reflected an attempt to implement key policy goals quickly and with minimal legislative hurdles.

• Statistical data on executive order issuance: Data on the number of executive orders issued during this period provides a quantitative measure of this approach.
• Examples of significant executive orders and their impact: Specific examples can illustrate the range and impact of executive orders on various policy areas.
• Criticisms of using executive orders to circumvent Congress: The heavy reliance on executive orders drew criticism from those who argued that it undermined the legislative process and the balance of power among government branches.

Legal Challenges to Executive Actions:

Many of Trump's executive actions faced legal challenges, highlighting the potential limitations of using executive power to bypass Congress.

• Examples of legal challenges to specific executive orders: Several executive orders were challenged in court, raising questions about their legality and constitutionality.
• The outcomes of these legal challenges: The outcomes of these challenges varied, with some orders being upheld and others being struck down.
• Implications for the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches: The legal challenges had significant implications for the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches of government.

Conclusion

Analyzing Trump's agenda reveals a presidency characterized by a bold approach to trade, a significant push for deregulation, and a heavy reliance on executive actions to achieve policy goals. His focus on renegotiating trade deals, imposing tariffs, and rolling back environmental and financial regulations left a lasting mark on the domestic and international landscape. The frequent use of executive orders, while efficient in the short term, also generated significant legal and political challenges. Understanding the successes and failures of Trump's agenda during his first 100 days provides valuable context for analyzing subsequent administrations and future policy debates concerning Trump's agenda. To delve deeper into specific policy decisions and their impact, further research into relevant government documents and academic analyses is encouraged.