Pokemon TCG: Pocket Celestial Guardians - A Disappointing Inclusion?

Henrik Larsen

5 min read

Post on May 29, 2025

4.4

Share

Lackluster Pull Rates and Value

One of the most significant criticisms leveled against Pocket Celestial Guardians centers on its perceived low pull rates for desirable cards. Many players reported a frustratingly low hit rate for the sought-after holo-rares and secret rares, leading to a sense of disappointment and frustration. The cost per pack, relative to the reward of obtaining valuable cards, is a major point of contention.

• Low percentage of hit rate for chase cards: Anecdotal evidence from online forums and social media suggests a significantly lower percentage of valuable cards compared to previous Pokémon TCG sets.
• High cost per pack relative to reward: The price point for Pocket Celestial Guardians packs, coupled with the reportedly low pull rates, makes acquiring desirable cards a costly endeavor.
• Comparison of pull rates to previous successful sets: A direct comparison with previous successful sets like Sword & Shield – Evolving Skies reveals a stark difference in the perceived value and pull rates of desirable cards within Pocket Celestial Guardians. Many players feel they are receiving significantly less for their investment.

This combination of low pull rates and high pack cost has negatively impacted the perceived value of Pocket Celestial Guardians, contributing to the overall feeling of disappointment amongst many Pokémon TCG players. The "Pocket Celestial Guardians pull rates" are a frequent topic of discussion, highlighting the core problem.

Underwhelming Card Selection and Playability

Beyond the pull rate issues, the overall card selection in Pocket Celestial Guardians has also drawn criticism. While the set introduces some new cards, many argue that it lacks impactful additions to the existing meta-game. Few cards have significantly altered established tournament decks. This lack of significant impact on the competitive landscape is a key factor contributing to the negative perception of the set.

• Few cards significantly impacting established tournament decks: Analysis of tournament results and decklists shows minimal adoption of Pocket Celestial Guardians cards into top-tier competitive decks.
• Lack of diversity in archetype support: The set seems to favor certain Pokémon types or archetypes, leaving others relatively unsupported, limiting its overall appeal to a broader range of players.
• Analysis of key cards and their impact on gameplay: A closer examination reveals that even the supposedly strong cards in the set haven't lived up to initial hype, failing to create the ripples through the established "Pokemon TCG competitive" scene that many expected.

The underwhelming card selection and lack of playability have further diminished the set's overall appeal, solidifying the concerns about its impact on the Pokémon TCG meta. The term "Pocket Celestial Guardians meta" is barely used, emphasizing its minor influence.

Artwork and Presentation

While subjective, the artwork and presentation of Pocket Celestial Guardians are generally considered acceptable. The card art is consistent with the Pokémon TCG’s usual high standard, showcasing detailed and vibrant illustrations. However, some players felt that the set lacked a distinct, memorable aesthetic compared to other expansions.

• Analysis of individual card art styles: Individual card art quality is generally praised; the artists' skill is undeniable.
• Assessment of the overall set's visual cohesiveness: While the individual artwork is strong, the overall aesthetic cohesion of the set isn't markedly superior to other recent releases.
• Comparison to art styles in other Pokémon TCG expansions: Compared to expansions like Celebrations or Shining Fates, the "Pocket Celestial Guardians artwork" doesn’t stand out in terms of unique visual style.

The presentation of the cards themselves is unremarkable. It meets the standard set by previous releases, offering little to add to the overall quality of the set. The overall "Pokemon TCG card art" is decent but ultimately unspectacular.

Community Reception and Online Sentiment

The online sentiment surrounding Pocket Celestial Guardians has been overwhelmingly negative. Forums, social media platforms, and review sites are flooded with complaints about poor pull rates and underwhelming card selection.

• Analysis of social media trends and discussions: Social media conversations reflect considerable frustration among players regarding the set's value and impact.
• Overview of online reviews and ratings: Online reviews consistently rate Pocket Celestial Guardians lower than many previous Pokémon TCG sets.
• Synthesis of player opinions and feedback: The collective feedback points to a general sense of disappointment and dissatisfaction with the set.

The negative "Pocket Celestial Guardians reviews" and the overall "Pokemon TCG community" reaction significantly contribute to the perception of the set as a letdown. The online "online feedback" overwhelmingly suggests that many felt cheated.

Conclusion: A Final Verdict on Pocket Celestial Guardians

In conclusion, Pocket Celestial Guardians has largely failed to meet the expectations of many Pokémon TCG players. The combination of poor pull rates, underwhelming card selection, and a lack of significant impact on the meta-game has resulted in a widespread sense of disappointment. While the artwork and presentation are acceptable, they aren't enough to offset the negative aspects. The negative "Pocket Celestial Guardians" reviews and community feedback solidify this assessment. Ultimately, many consider it a disappointing addition to the Pokémon TCG lineup.

What are your thoughts on the Pocket Celestial Guardians set? Share your pulls and opinions in the comments below!